Saturday, March 07, 2009
JSH: So what's your explanation?
With a simple proof of a solution to the factoring problem there is just no more room for denial about the reality of people lying about my research, while one remaining question is, why?
x^2 - Dy^2 = 1
requires that
(D-1)j^2 + (j+/-1)^2 = (x+y)^2
where j = ((x+Dy) -/+1)/D.
And it's easy algebra to go from there and factor D with factors of D-1, but I've watched posters lie for days and posters CONTINUE lying about the simple reality here.
I used mathematical objects I call tautological spaces against Pell's Equation just to see what they might do, through what I call my Quadratic Diophantine Theorem.
Similar mathematical objects to what I used to prove Fermat's Last Theorem. But in this case I generally solved binary quadratic Diophantine equations, and part of the bonus of that accomplishment was a solution to the factoring problem.
Easy algebra.
Mathematical society to date has to my knowledge ignored the general solution to binary quadratic Diophantine equations and is currently trying to ignore the solution to the factoring problem.
I imagine researchers around the world still trying to squeeze out improvements with things like the Number Field Sieve—and probably relying on public funds in many cases—despite the problem being solved.
There is a willfulness in that I believe. A desire to be wrong as long as they maintain their flawed view of the mathematics.
At this time it's not clear what the full impact will be, but it is increasingly clear that mathematics as a discipline took a wrong turn over a hundred years ago. Current practitioners are quite simply, possibly, fakes.
The fate of the human race lies in correct mathematics. We're running on fumes mathematically now mostly using mathematics that is over one hundred years old, with mathematicians doing bogus research.
It seems impossible for greater advancement of science to occur without the correct mathematics. It is unclear how bad the impact is on things we think we know, but it may be huge.
Our reality itself may be very different than people imagine because there has been this massive error corrupting things.
Our physics might be a hundred years further than it is now, without the error. Question is, will we recover from this massive blow?
What will be the full impact on the survival potential of the human species?
x^2 - Dy^2 = 1
requires that
(D-1)j^2 + (j+/-1)^2 = (x+y)^2
where j = ((x+Dy) -/+1)/D.
And it's easy algebra to go from there and factor D with factors of D-1, but I've watched posters lie for days and posters CONTINUE lying about the simple reality here.
I used mathematical objects I call tautological spaces against Pell's Equation just to see what they might do, through what I call my Quadratic Diophantine Theorem.
Similar mathematical objects to what I used to prove Fermat's Last Theorem. But in this case I generally solved binary quadratic Diophantine equations, and part of the bonus of that accomplishment was a solution to the factoring problem.
Easy algebra.
Mathematical society to date has to my knowledge ignored the general solution to binary quadratic Diophantine equations and is currently trying to ignore the solution to the factoring problem.
I imagine researchers around the world still trying to squeeze out improvements with things like the Number Field Sieve—and probably relying on public funds in many cases—despite the problem being solved.
There is a willfulness in that I believe. A desire to be wrong as long as they maintain their flawed view of the mathematics.
At this time it's not clear what the full impact will be, but it is increasingly clear that mathematics as a discipline took a wrong turn over a hundred years ago. Current practitioners are quite simply, possibly, fakes.
The fate of the human race lies in correct mathematics. We're running on fumes mathematically now mostly using mathematics that is over one hundred years old, with mathematicians doing bogus research.
It seems impossible for greater advancement of science to occur without the correct mathematics. It is unclear how bad the impact is on things we think we know, but it may be huge.
Our reality itself may be very different than people imagine because there has been this massive error corrupting things.
Our physics might be a hundred years further than it is now, without the error. Question is, will we recover from this massive blow?
What will be the full impact on the survival potential of the human species?
# posted by James Harris @ 16:30 
