Thursday, January 18, 2007
JSH: Just a basic screw-up
People don't argue for years over basic algebra that is actually wrong.
And all the rationalizations given do not explain why a mathematical journal would publish a paper from an amateur that relied on basic algebra that was wrong.
There just isn't enough material in a simple argument with basic algebra for people to go on and on for years.
Or for any mathematicians to accidentally think it might be correct when it's wrong.
What I found was a basic screw-up over a hundred years ago that just wasn't caught until now.
But mathematics professors sitting at universities who have built careers around the screw-up, who idolize dead mathematicians who were part of the screw-up would just as soon forget about it and keep teaching math that is no longer about what is mathematically correct.
And I see no way to stop them.
They just failed. People fail.
These mathematicians just failed. But they won't accept they failed, so they keep failing.
And there's not a lot I can do.
And all the rationalizations given do not explain why a mathematical journal would publish a paper from an amateur that relied on basic algebra that was wrong.
There just isn't enough material in a simple argument with basic algebra for people to go on and on for years.
Or for any mathematicians to accidentally think it might be correct when it's wrong.
What I found was a basic screw-up over a hundred years ago that just wasn't caught until now.
But mathematics professors sitting at universities who have built careers around the screw-up, who idolize dead mathematicians who were part of the screw-up would just as soon forget about it and keep teaching math that is no longer about what is mathematically correct.
And I see no way to stop them.
They just failed. People fail.
These mathematicians just failed. But they won't accept they failed, so they keep failing.
And there's not a lot I can do.