Harristotelian Logic

Why would posters who spent so much energy in post after post to convince other Usenet readers of false mathematics still keep at it now, as you can see in threads where I give the simple proof, and now there is a growing response of just continued ridicule?

Because they see themselves as brilliant, and see you as seeing them as brilliant, and they wish to keep that role.

So it's simple delusion.

For those of you who do not understand the complexities of how some people seek attention, just consider the Jerry Springer Show.

They are like performers on an episode of that show and will continue as long as they can convince themselves that you like them.

Yup, they want you to like them.

As long as they think you like them, they will continue to reply in my threads, carefully going around the simple mathematical proofs which would destroy their delusion and congratulate themselves as they get the attention of the world as my research draws the attention of the world.

So they are getting a lot of attention, at the expense of my research, where I can prove all these things simply but have a lot of hanger's on because they think you people love them.

Now going forward I can try to move more to the mainstream, like with my paper still currently under review at the Annals of Mathematics at Princeton, and I can think more about what to do with my latest, newly revised paper.

I used Usenet as a brainstorming area and ended up with a lot of parasites who can't quite get it that it's over, as it's not for them!

Look at them in those threads, wallowing in it with ever more glee, despite some very simple algebra proving they are wrong.

They want you to love them, and believe you do, from "Tim Peters" to "Rupert", to "William Hughes", and even David Ullrich, despite being a math professor, and Arturo Magidin.

They believe you love them, love their show, and that they are giving you, the readership of these newsgroups, what you want.