Saturday, December 30, 2006
JSH: It IS fraud
I think many of you think of this as meaningless and inconsequential where you argue with me and attack mathematical research easily proven to be correct and you win as long as no one realizes what is going on.
But it is fraud.
Some of you may believe that you are protected by various devices you use in your own comments or by claiming that you had agreement from others, but like with my prime counting research, it is obviously different in crucial ways from what was known before, despite similarities.
It may seem inconsequential posting here on Usenet, but posts are public comments so they can be used against you later.
There are a lot of precedents that could be set by this situation, and it is likely that Usenet itself could face much greater legal scrutiny.
As obviously some of you are using the freedoms given by Usenet in perpetuating a fraud to block acceptance of easily proven mathematical results, where it is also easy to prove their value.
Consider a world looking at my equations versus what was there before, hearing explanations for how they are different and just being able to SEE they are different as well, as it contemplates punishments for some of you who may have wanted that money for your retirement versus seeing it go to someone else because of some stuff you said on Usenet thinking you'd never be accountable for it.
It IS fraud to make false claims that cause harm to others, and in this case, making false claims against mathematical research can be shown to be a harm against humanity itself.
But it is fraud.
Some of you may believe that you are protected by various devices you use in your own comments or by claiming that you had agreement from others, but like with my prime counting research, it is obviously different in crucial ways from what was known before, despite similarities.
It may seem inconsequential posting here on Usenet, but posts are public comments so they can be used against you later.
There are a lot of precedents that could be set by this situation, and it is likely that Usenet itself could face much greater legal scrutiny.
As obviously some of you are using the freedoms given by Usenet in perpetuating a fraud to block acceptance of easily proven mathematical results, where it is also easy to prove their value.
Consider a world looking at my equations versus what was there before, hearing explanations for how they are different and just being able to SEE they are different as well, as it contemplates punishments for some of you who may have wanted that money for your retirement versus seeing it go to someone else because of some stuff you said on Usenet thinking you'd never be accountable for it.
It IS fraud to make false claims that cause harm to others, and in this case, making false claims against mathematical research can be shown to be a harm against humanity itself.
# posted by James Harris @ 14:50 
