Friday, November 10, 2006
JSH: Attack the discoverer
They are frauds. People who figured out how to use "pure math" to techno-babble and take home paychecks for doing of value to humanity have to fear real discoverers.
So they attack them.
That's why you have such a well-formed structure in the math community against "cranks" and "crackpots" not because such people are dangerous, as truly disturbed people don't make a lot of sense so it's not like they can be very convincing with rigid logic and in vigorous debate.
You have an attack culture against such people to catch the people who are neither.
Some of you I think rationalize by saying it's me and my personality, so I say do a web search on Britney Gallivan.
Who did she piss off? Is she some person angering people on the web?
Why does her research get marginalized?
Maybe you think if you play by their rules and learn within the system, getting a math degree, they'll let you make real discoveries.
Think again.
They'll teach you to claim that people who aren't making real discoveries actually are, but if you make real discoveries of your own, you'll be sidelined, and if you complain, you're a crank.
Do a web search on Perti Lounesto.
You have no idea how bad this is, or what happens when you have spent years working at being a mathematician and maybe figure something out that makes you a threat and none of that matters.
The best minds simply leave. The story does not get told. The parasites remain and party.
It's not about me. They'd do the same to you if you had my discoveries but you'd be an easier target than I am.
That's the only difference. You'd have probably given up by now and been silenced and bittered.
Crying quietly to yourself about the evils of this world and in your disillusionment, giving the parasites the victory they want and seek.
Why else do you think they engage in so many psychological attacks?
The ploy is to attack the discoverer—into silence.
So they attack them.
That's why you have such a well-formed structure in the math community against "cranks" and "crackpots" not because such people are dangerous, as truly disturbed people don't make a lot of sense so it's not like they can be very convincing with rigid logic and in vigorous debate.
You have an attack culture against such people to catch the people who are neither.
Some of you I think rationalize by saying it's me and my personality, so I say do a web search on Britney Gallivan.
Who did she piss off? Is she some person angering people on the web?
Why does her research get marginalized?
Maybe you think if you play by their rules and learn within the system, getting a math degree, they'll let you make real discoveries.
Think again.
They'll teach you to claim that people who aren't making real discoveries actually are, but if you make real discoveries of your own, you'll be sidelined, and if you complain, you're a crank.
Do a web search on Perti Lounesto.
You have no idea how bad this is, or what happens when you have spent years working at being a mathematician and maybe figure something out that makes you a threat and none of that matters.
The best minds simply leave. The story does not get told. The parasites remain and party.
It's not about me. They'd do the same to you if you had my discoveries but you'd be an easier target than I am.
That's the only difference. You'd have probably given up by now and been silenced and bittered.
Crying quietly to yourself about the evils of this world and in your disillusionment, giving the parasites the victory they want and seek.
Why else do you think they engage in so many psychological attacks?
The ploy is to attack the discoverer—into silence.
# posted by James Harris @ 21:11 
