Thursday, October 26, 2006
JSH: Go with prime counting
When it comes to the question of whether or not the math field IS corrupted in "pure math" you can answer that question easily by going to prime counting.
Primes are just such a popular area and they are such a big deal in mathematics that it's not hard if you want to get to the bottom of things to evaluate claims in that area, and denials.
The math world I thought existed before I had my own math discoveries would not have ignored, dismissed or downplayed my prime counting research. But cons pretending to be real mathematicians who care about mathematics would, if it suited them.
That's what they do. Cons do what suits them, not what's important to the world.
Here they have turned the system upside down, where legitimate research is ignored, while their made up research gets their people prizes, grants, and accolades.
That's how they can ignore research on primes, and how they can ignore simple factoring ideas like what I've talked about recently.
Go with prime counting. Just do a web search on the subject, look at previous research and even notice how similar they are to what I have—and then note the differences.
Used to be you might have believed mathematicians cared so much about mathematics they'd chase down every detail, get excited about every little thing that might be new in an important area—but notice how that goes away with someone like me—a harsh critic willing to tell you these people lie.
Do the web search. Easy: "prime counting". Go do it.
Primes are just such a popular area and they are such a big deal in mathematics that it's not hard if you want to get to the bottom of things to evaluate claims in that area, and denials.
The math world I thought existed before I had my own math discoveries would not have ignored, dismissed or downplayed my prime counting research. But cons pretending to be real mathematicians who care about mathematics would, if it suited them.
That's what they do. Cons do what suits them, not what's important to the world.
Here they have turned the system upside down, where legitimate research is ignored, while their made up research gets their people prizes, grants, and accolades.
That's how they can ignore research on primes, and how they can ignore simple factoring ideas like what I've talked about recently.
Go with prime counting. Just do a web search on the subject, look at previous research and even notice how similar they are to what I have—and then note the differences.
Used to be you might have believed mathematicians cared so much about mathematics they'd chase down every detail, get excited about every little thing that might be new in an important area—but notice how that goes away with someone like me—a harsh critic willing to tell you these people lie.
Do the web search. Easy: "prime counting". Go do it.
# posted by James Harris @ 23:51 
