Sunday, January 06, 2008
Surprised yet? RSA over, but...
If you have any kind of understanding of algebra, some understanding of factoring, and have read my derivation of what I call the factoring congruences so that you know they are correct, and heard how they can be used against an RSA public key then you may wonder why there is such quiet.
Well I have experience with major mathematical results where I looked for an expected reaction from the mathematical community and there was quiet, and I concluded that they wait to see if anyone else will notice!!!
It's not like I keep a low profile and I've routinely emailed mathematicians about my research around the world and used to submit papers routinely as well.
That's how I know as much as I do about how broken the modern mathematical community is, from my experiences with past proofs, where I realized they had to be checking to see if they could just safely ignore me.
So they let a proof of Fermat's Last Theorem go by, protected claims of Wiles having proven FLT—he did not—and ignored lots of other research of mine as well.
I pay attention to HOW people reply to me in posts as well, and I see a lot of them as tests to see how much resonance I get on the newsgroups, where the issue is how much the bulk of you are convinced as your opinion is what is important.
After all, interest in mathematics drives a lot of books and relates back to funding, and there is even some TV show out there now, so your opinion is worth money.
Now your opinion may help decide the fate of nations as these people do not seem to be very bright, as how could you play dumb games with simple mathematics that end the viability of RSA encryption?
But here we are, and the quiet tells me they are doing just that, waiting to see how you react, hoping they can just let it slide by, and looking to sell you some more books down the line. Maybe something else on primes…
Well I have experience with major mathematical results where I looked for an expected reaction from the mathematical community and there was quiet, and I concluded that they wait to see if anyone else will notice!!!
It's not like I keep a low profile and I've routinely emailed mathematicians about my research around the world and used to submit papers routinely as well.
That's how I know as much as I do about how broken the modern mathematical community is, from my experiences with past proofs, where I realized they had to be checking to see if they could just safely ignore me.
So they let a proof of Fermat's Last Theorem go by, protected claims of Wiles having proven FLT—he did not—and ignored lots of other research of mine as well.
I pay attention to HOW people reply to me in posts as well, and I see a lot of them as tests to see how much resonance I get on the newsgroups, where the issue is how much the bulk of you are convinced as your opinion is what is important.
After all, interest in mathematics drives a lot of books and relates back to funding, and there is even some TV show out there now, so your opinion is worth money.
Now your opinion may help decide the fate of nations as these people do not seem to be very bright, as how could you play dumb games with simple mathematics that end the viability of RSA encryption?
But here we are, and the quiet tells me they are doing just that, waiting to see how you react, hoping they can just let it slide by, and looking to sell you some more books down the line. Maybe something else on primes…